Time Management Tips Weekly
Time Management Tips of Insanely Busy People
LAST UPDATED ON JUNE 30, 2017 – MY FREE MARKETING NEWSLETTER
What do the calendars of entrepreneurs, VIPs, and famous business people look like?
When I met Taylor Pearson, we nerded out over scheduling. We’d compare notes, ideas, and theories on how to optimize our time.
In the weirdest exchanging of pictures in my life, we’d share pics of…
Naughty, naughty Noah.
Because I’m one to share, here’s a screenshot of my calendar:
Everything is color-coded:
- Green = Gym
- Salmon = Sumo work
- Purple = Podcast planning, recording, or brainstorming
- Grey = Growth learning or consuming (i.e. reading)
- Red = Random weird and fun shit, like hanging out with OkDork readers
For some people, it’s overkill to put so much in their calendars.
But for me, it’s critical.
When I optimize and manage my schedule properly, everything falls in line. My days are easier, I’m more organized, and I’m happier.
To help you optimize your own time, I invited Taylor to share the calendar tips, scheduling habits, and time optimization hacks of the world’s best.
Take it away, Taylor…
A few months ago I ran an experiment on myself that completely changed the way I spend my time.
I actually measured, tracked and analyzed it.
There’s all sorts of tools to measure, track and analyze how you spend your money or your website metrics, but not your time. And yet time is just as important if not more important, isn’t it? If you have more time you can use it to make more money or get more traffic.
The result has transformed how I spend my time. I am far better at saying no to things that don’t matter and focusing on the things that do.
Instead of giving you a bunch of broad, B.S. lessons like “watch less television!” like a bad top 10 article on BuzzFeed, I’m going to tell you EXACTLY what you need to do.
I’m going to share a simple exercise you can do this week to help you prioritize and focus on the most important things in your life.
Specifically, you’ll learn:
- How to go plan your ideal week
- Track how you actually spend your time (so you can make adjustments)
- Ways to keep this all in your calendar — so you decrease the chance of messing up
When you see what you ACTUALLY do vs. what you WANT to do every week, you’ll have a clear list of action items for how to spend your time.
That could be:
- Taking random naps (because, why not?)
- Working on fun side projects or side businesses
- Spending time with family and friends
- Or anything else
I’m not going to tell you how to spend your time — instead, I’m going to give you the secrets VIPs and insanely busy people use to make sure they’re putting their time in the right places.
Success is fundamentally about how you spend your time.
Time is the base currency of life. If you have more time, you can convert it into anything you want:
- More money (to buy tacos)
- More time with your family
- Faster progress on that project you know you should be doing
- Exercising more
- Reading more
- Watching more cat videos
Below I’ll share with you not only what I learned, and how I set up my system to find my own personal successes, but also give you the tools and resources to do it yourself.
- Experiment #1 – Organizing Time by Energy Level
- Experiment #2 – Organizing by Value
- How to Plan and Live Your Own Ideal Week
- The 80/20 Version for Busy People
Experiment #1 – Organizing Time by Energy Level
For the first experiment, I tested for two main things:
First, I thought I wasn’t spending enough of my day in “Maker” time.
Maker time is a concept from Paul Graham’s essay Maker Time, Manager Time. In it, he explains that work time can be divided into either maker or manager time.
- Manager time is usually 30 minute or 1 hour blocks of meetings, emails, and calls.
- Maker time is 2-4 hour blocks of time to really dive into a creative project — writing, coding, creating mock-ups, or mapping out a business strategy.
It’s the same thing as what Cal Newport has called “Deep Work,” the highest leverage work that you need to block out time for to move your business forward as opposed to just keep it running.
I felt like I was getting sucked into too many managerial tasks like email, meetings and phone calls and not spending enough of my time in maker mode.
Second, I thought I wasn’t spending enough time learning.
I find that I need to consume a lot of content to keep a steady “idea flow” going with my projects.
Often times, if I’m stuck and can’t figure out how to solve a business problem, I just need to put it down and read about it.
Almost all business problems have been solved by someone else and it’s a lot easier to learn from someone else than invent from scratch.
I felt like spending a little more time learning from someone else’s mistakes might save me a lot of my own time.
To solve these two issues, I came up with a categorization scheme using Google Calendar:
- Maker – Bold Green. 2-4 hour blocks of creative work
- Manager – Orange. Phone calls, meetings, email and other managerial tasks
- Admin – Bold Red. Low energy work like making a reservation at a restaurant or disputing a credit card charge
- Exercise – Turquoise. Getting swole
- Learning – Bold Blue. Reading book and articles, or going through courses
- Rest/Fun/Social – Purple. Recharge time
At the beginning of the week, I planned out my ideal week:
At the end of each day, I went back and adjusted my calendar to reflect how I was actually spending my time. Here’s what it looked like on my calendar at the end of week:
I broke that down by the categories at the end of the week:
|Download a copy of this spreadsheet|
What I Learned from Experiment #1
1) I was about 80% of the way there
Here’s how my actual week compared to my ideal week:
- I was spending more time in manager mode than I wanted (25% actual vs 15% target)
- My social time was less than I wanted (23.4% actual vs 30% target)
- My maker time was less than I wanted (17.55% actual vs 20% target)
The difference is because of the “domino” effect: I spent more time doing manager “admin” tasks, which took away from both social time and maker time.
Here it is in chart form:
I was surprised that I was actually pretty close to where I would want to be ideally.
I think the activities taking up those chunks of time will, and should, evolve (I don’t want to be doing the same exact maker work five years from now.)
I had really been wanting to read more, but I’m reading 15 hours/week, and also doing other learning stuff (events, courses, documentaries.) That’s probably pretty close to max for me without going into information overload.
I find I don’t really have time to process it if I spend more than 4 hours a day consuming and learning. Again, this was more of a perception gap (feeling like I was not reading enough) than a reality gap.
2) How I spend time is NOT how I spend attention
Tracking my time like this made me confront how I spend my time vs. how I spend my attention.
The amount of time I spent working a lot less than I expected, but a lot of the time I spent doing other things, I was actually worrying about work.
A block of time on my calendar that said “Train at the Gym” would more accurately be labeled “train at the gym and spend all your time in between sets worrying about the 20% dip in conversion rate you just discovered.”
An hour spent reading on my calendar might really be half an hour reading and half an hour mulling over landing page layouts.
I found it hard to “single task” and focus on just one thing at a time.
Here are some of the adjustments I made to improve that.
- Reading and Maker work. I leave my phone in another room or on the other side of the room so I can’t pick it up to “check on something real quick” and end up spending twenty minutes on Twitter. I also use a tool called Freedom to block myself off distracting sites while I’m working on my computer. Noah told me he liked the Block Site plugin for Chrome that does the same thing.
- Working out. I made an aggressively loud playlist to force my brain to shut off when I’m working out.
- Shutting down for the weekend. I try to do my review and planning Saturday morning so that I can shut down for the weekend and be more present with whoever I am spending time with.
At the end of the day, all of these, though helpful, are short-term solutions. More than anything it made me double down on my mindfulness meditation practice to try and train my brain to get better at not being led down rabbit holes.
I’ve been meditating for five years and felt like I’d improved a lot but this was a reminder that mindfulness is still something I have a huge amount of room to improve on. I signed up for a weekend meditation retreat that I had been putting of for months.
3) I needed to eliminate some Manager Time
The biggest change that I realized I needed to make was to reduce some of the manager time.
I dove in and reviewed how I was spending manager time. Then, I went back and grouped the manager tasks into 6 categories.
Next to each category, I labeled how I felt about it according to 4 options:
For example, if I thought manager time on a specific task was REALLY beneficial to my goals I would label it “great.”
If it was a timesuck, I would label it “bad.”
What do you notice about the breakout?
There’s one “bad” mark — which took me 3 hours of my life I’ll never get back. I realized that I could rid of the bad by hiring a bookkeeper, something else I had been putting off for months.
Here’s a second one: Even though it was “OK,” I realized I could cut down the “process inboxes” block. In other words, I could spend less time answering emails, responding to Facebook messages, and checking Twitter.
I set a goal of reducing the 6.5 hours of process inboxes to 2.5 hours per week by limiting myself to a 30-minute window each day and just responding to the most important messages.
This gave me 6 hours I could turn and put into maker time and rest time which would get me pretty close to my ideal week schedule.
4) We don’t always know what we want
Helen Fischer is a Research Associate in the Department of Anthropology at Rutgers University. She is also the Chief Scientific Advisor to the Internet dating site Match.com.
In an interview with Krista Tippett, she explained that one of the most surprising things she had found from working with Match.com was that there was very little correlation between what people said they wanted in a partner and who the actually ended up with.
Airlines spent years surveying people asking what they wanted. They got answers like bigger seats and better food. However, they eventually discovered that 90% of flyers choose their airline based on price.
This is a problem called revealed preference (what people actually want) vs. stated preference (what people say they want).
This is true of business, too. Here’s a test:
- Tell your friends a crazy business idea you have and ask them what they think
- Create a minimum viable product for your business idea, show it to them, and ask if they want to buy
Your friends might say something sounds neat… but when you actually ask them to spend money on it, they get cold feet.
Something similar happened with my schedule.
How I thought I wanted to spend my time in an ideal world wasn’t how I actually wanted to spend my time.
In order to get down to exactly the schedule I said I wanted, I needed to cut more manager work out.
The obvious thing to cut was “Pass it Forward” time. This is time I spend to help a friend or reader with a project they’re working on. I could stop doing this, but I realized that it was more important to me than getting another 3 hours of maker time or reading time. Lots and lots of people have helped me out and it makes me feel really good to spend some time passing that forward.
5) The opportunity cost of saying “Yes”
By tracking my time in detail, I was able to actually figure out what tradeoffs I was making.
Often times, we say yes to something because we don’t realize the opportunity cost of our time.
Everytime we say yes to one thing, we are necessarily saying no to something else. The number of hours in a day and days is a week is fixed; you can not create more of them.
When someone asks if you have time for a meeting next Tuesday, you may have nothing on your calendar, so you say “sure.” If you hadn’t agreed to the meeting, you would have done something with that time – but what?
By getting clear on what the “what” was that I could be doing made me better at saying no.
When you say yes that one hour phone call next week, you are saying no to revamping your sales page or going to the gym or getting home an hour earlier.
There is not always a right or wrong answer, but if you realize what you are saying no to every time you say yes, then you can make a judgement call: “Is this phone call more important to me than going to the gym today?”
If yes, then do it. If not, then don’t.
Experiment #2 – Organizing by Value
The week after I finished Experiment #1, I was having coffee with a friend and he suggested categorizing the week by the value of the tasks, instead of energy level like I did above.
Some tasks may qualify as “manager”, which seem bad on the surface. But, when we dive deeper we realize they’re extremely valuable (like negotiating a big joint venture deal or selling a high-end package).
How do you determine the value level of a task?
I used a table provided by Perry Marshall in his book 80/20 Sales and Marketing that broke tasks down into $10 – $10,000 per hour:
For tasks that weren’t included in Perry’s list, I used a similar four tier system from Dan Sullivan to group activities:
- Unique Ability Activities ($10,000/hour work). Tasks at which you show superior skill, energy, passion and desire for never-ending improvement
- Excellent Activities ($1,000/hour work). Tasks which you have superior skill and reputation, but no passion
- Competent Activities ($100/hour work). Tasks where you met minimum standard, but cause you anxiety and feel repetitive
- Incompetence Activities ($10/hour work). tasks you constantly encounter failure, frustration, conflict and stress.
Here’s a personal example: Bookkeeping which annoys me and takes up tons of valuable time and mental energy — according to the chart above, it’s a $10 per hour task
On the other hand, writing articles and essays is something I really enjoy doing.It’s a $10,000/hour Unique Ability.
Note: I don’t actually make $10,000 per hour immediately after writing, but the doors it opens adds up. The same idea I come up with for an article can become a book. That book can lead to courses, consulting, events or other backend services.
Based on combining these systems, here’s the new scheme I came up with:
- Bold Green – $10,000 per hour (Unique) tasks
- Yellow – $1,000 per hour (Excellent) tasks
- Orange – $100 per hour (Competent) tasks
- Bold Red – $10 per hour (Incompetent) tasks
- Turquoise – Exercise
- Bold Blue – Learning
- Purple – Rest/Fun/Social
Just like in the first experiment, I planned out my ideal week to start, then went back and updated my calendar at the end, to show how I was actually spending my time.
Here was what the plan looked like:
Here was how it came out:
This new system forced me to be honest about how valuable specific tasks were.
A phone call where I was building a valuable partnership or developing culture might be $1,000 or $10,000 per hour work. On the other hand, “busy” work which I do to keep myself distracted wasn’t worth anything… and it was now staring me right in the face.
What I Learned from Experiment #2
1) I needed to reduce my $10 per hour and $100 per hour task time
Here’s what my time breakdown looked like:
A phone call where I was making a restaurant reservation or going over administrative activities might be $10 or $100 per hour work.
Here it is broken down in Chart Form:
7 hours for my $10 per hour tasks, and 9 hours for my $100 per hours tasks, was too much, so I made a list of what those were to decide where adjustments could be made:
Process Inboxes: My plan from Experiment #1 to reduce the time spent processing inboxes hadn’t worked. I spent less time on it during the week, but had to make up for it on the weekend.
A part of this was imagined value vs. perceived value.
Bucketing ALL email into the $10 per hour mindset was the wrong way to look at it.
For example, the time responding to important messages from clients and prospective clients was way more valuable than $10 per hour.
It’s more accurate to say that email has very fast declining marginal returns. The first 30 minutes of email in a day is $100 per hour work. It falls off steeply from there.
I went back in and set up more filters to let my most important emails into my inbox, and keep everything else tucked away to look at only if I want. Hiring an assistant to filter the $10 emails out is probably the next step.
Proofreading: This is something I would normally hire out, but I was on deadline and didn’t have time. Since that isn’t a recurring problem, I’m not worried about it. It’s unlikely to show up in other weeks.
Organize Dinner: Organizing a monthly author dinner I host in New York was something I knew in the back of my head I should have been outsourcing for a long-time, but seeing it on paper made finally pull the trigger and get it off my plate.
Call with Development Partners: This was a couple one-off call about an app I was considering getting developed. Since it wasn’t something I was going to be doing repeatedly, I ignored it. Before I spend a lot of time solving a problem, I always ask myself “If I ignore this problem, will it go away?” If it will, I just ignore it.
Consulting Calls and Mastermind Calls: The consulting calls and mastermind calls I find really valuable. I thought about replacing them with potentially higher value tasks, but could not think of anything.
Record New Module for Masterclass: For the masterclass module, I realized that it was better to do product revamps all at once instead of gradually over time.
2) Tasks that seem the same can have dramatically different values
In his document Perry lists “attending most meetings” as a $10 per hour task and “Establishing values and culture” as a $10,000 per hour task.
On my calendar, both these activities might be labeled as “team meeting” but how they were conducted dramatically altered the value. Was I using the meetings as lessons, and referring back to our culture document? Or was I just solving immediate, small problems with little long term benefit?
I was perhaps generous with myself in ranking the week I spent rewriting an autoresponder as $10,000 per hour work.
I was repositioning the product which Perry would rank as $10,000 per hour, but in truth it might be more accurately a $1,000 per hour “building your sales funnel task.”
Just like with the meetings, the valuable thing was that I actually had to have this conversation with myself. Was I just making marginal, sustaining improvements to the auto-responder when I could have been focusing on bigger potential, breakthrough ideas?
How to Plan and Live Your Own Ideal Week
Excellence is an art won by training and habituation. We do not act rightly because we have virtue or excellence, but we rather have those because we have acted rightly. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit. -Aristotle